Week 2: CheckPoint - Ch. 4 Questions
1.
International organizations can be an excellent
resource for companies operating internationally. A key benefit
to these organizations is the financing available to companies
operating internationally. Conversely, these organizations can be
a major hindrance to doing business internationally. An example
of these difficulties is the additional legislation, and rules, that
are imposed on businesses which operate globally. It is key for
businesspeople, and students, to be aware of these organizations and
their strengths and weaknesses so they are prepared to work in the
modern, global, environment. (Ball, McCulloch, Frantz, Geringer,
Minor, 2006, p. 117)
2.
There is a very strong political aspect to
international trade that private trade groups are not equipped to
handle. An aspect of the political problem is the subsidies that
many governments offer their producers. To deal with the subsidy
issue requires an organization that is focused on political issues and
thus is better equipped to negotiate a compromise. Secondarily,
even with trade becoming more fair the financial prosperity gap between
wealthy and poor countries continues to grow. This suggests
problems deeper than trade issues that again can best be handled by an
organization that has significant political strength.
Fundamentally, the UN offers a unique mix of political and trade
strengths that cannot be replaced by private trade groups. (Ball,
et al., 2006, p. 121,124-125)
3.
The WTO has at its root the concept of the
International Trade Union that never materialized following World War
II. After some suggestions by the United States, that were
accepted, GATT became the de facto international trade
organization. The GATT was eventually superseded, and replaced,
by the WTO. (Ball, et al., 2006, p. 123-125)
Bilateral trade agreements are generally thought as
a contributing factor towards WWI and exacerbating the effect of the
Great Depression. A key negative component of those bilateral
agreements was rising tariffs which were greatly minimized with the
move to multilateral trade agreements. While there has been clear
benefits from multilateral trade agreements these tend to work heavily
to the benefit of industrialized nations. Special bilateral
agreements would probably be a beneficial to the global economy when
dealing with less industrialized nations. (Bilateralism, para.
2-4)
4.
The Commission is the executive branch of the
European Union. It oversees the day to day administrative
functions of the government and "ensuring proper implementation of the
provisions of the Treaty of Rome" (Ball, et al., 2006, p. 132).
The Council of Ministers is where policy decisions
are made for the European Union. The presidency of the Council of
Ministers is held for six months and is rotated among the member
countries. (Ball, et al., 2006, p. 132-133)
The Parliament is the body, and forum, that allows a
country's issues and requests to be made apparent to the Council of
Ministers. The Parliament has very little authority, though that
is slowly changing. (Ball, et al., 2006, p. 133)
The European Court of Justice is the judicial body
of the European Union. This body presides over issues resulting
from the Treaty of Rome. In reagards to treaty issues the court's
jurisdiction supersedes that of the member nation's judicial
systems. (Ball, et al., 2006, p. 133)
5.
The EU has had a very powerful impact on foreign
business. Due to the large population that the EU now represent
it forces companies to comply with their rules. Historically
being in compliance with United States laws was sufficient to do
business anywhere in the world. Now the EU, due to their size and
more restrictive laws, has forced companies to comply with their
policies. A large impact was seen with Microsoft in their
software contracts. (Ball, et al., 2006, p. 134)
By the EU having more power than the national
government in business-regulation it has been able to leverage their
combined buying power. In turn this has resulted in much more
favorable trading than would otherwise be possible.
6.
There was concern by organized labor that jobs would
be lost, especially to Mexico, as labor was much cheaper in that
country. There was the additional concern in Canada of losing
their national identity. As is stands now the concerns were
unfounded. With the two-way trading among the members growing
over 111% in ten years this has benefited all of the members, and
probably resulted in the creation of new jobs to meet demand.
(Ball, et al., 2006, p. 137)
7.
The most significant aspect of OECD is their
publishing of business and economic reports on member countries.
This can be extremely beneficial for companies who are considering
doing business within one of these countries, or are already doing
business there and want to monitor their investment strategy.
Secondarily OECD offers a means for proposing legislation to member
countries. This could be a very large benefit if the current
legislation within a member country is unfavorable for trading and
investment. (Ball, et al., 2006, p. 127)
8.
There needs to be a significant amount of
international trade before it is worthwhile to participate in an
economic integration agreement. If the county is in extreme
poverty there would be few exports and very few imports.
Furthermore, if a country is very isolationist, such as the United
States in the early 1900's, than there would not be a need to have
economic integration agreements. Furthermore, any such agreements
would only undermine the country's isolationist policies.
9.
A significant reason for the trade arrangements
between Mercusor and the EU is that they both get the benefit of
establishing trade with a number of countries. This minimizes the
hassle and overhead while also maximizing return. The most
significant reason probably has to do with poor relations with the
United States and Brazil over crop subsidies, especially cotton.
Since Brazil is the largest member country of Merecusor poor relations
with Brazil would translate into poor relations with Mercusor.
10.
A small businessperson exporting agricultural
products would find the section on OECD very useful. With OECD
they would find information that would help them determine the best
place to export their goods. Furthermore, these reports would
also provide valuable insight into market conditions, as well as trade
restrictions, that would impede the sale of their product.
This chapter would also provide an overview of some
of the international difficulties that face someone participating in
international business. A key aspect of this is trade
restrictions and tariffs that may be imposed on their product limiting
its appeal.
The section on the European Union would also be a
key aspect. They are are major segment of the international
community. Dealing with them is not optional when dealing with
European countries so it is important to understand the EU
framework. Even more so, due to their size, they can be a very
large competitor on the international market and may be able to
leverage more favorable trade agreements. It is key to understand
the EU so that you can understand this risk.
References
Ball, D. A., McCulloch, W. H. Jr., Frantz, P. L., Geringer, & J.
M., Minor, M. S. (2006). International business: The challenge of
global competition (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bilateralism. Retrieved on July 5, 2005 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilateralism
© Erik Smith 2005
Licensed under the GNU
Free Documentation License